Nsites · City of Indianapolis Charter School Intelligence Platform

OEI Financial Validation Lab

Nsites CQ2 calculation, source traceability & replication validation

Reviewer: Allan Bell - Nsites
Run sealed 04 Sep 2026 · 18:16 UTC
Three-School Matrix / MATCHBOOK / FY2024-25 / Debt Default
Matchbook Learning Schools of Indiana, Inc. · FY2024-25 · Annual Audited · Calculation level: Network

Debt Default

Whether the organization is in default or delinquency on any debt or lease obligation.

Formula: Qualitative determination

Meets Standard: No default MS · waived covenant violation MS with disclosure · default DNMS

Nsites logoresult
Covenant violation with waiver
MS
Published OEIresult
No
MS
Status
REQUIRES HUMAN JUDGMENT
Nsites logo
From Data To Decisions
Formula — OEI-MSCS Performance Framework 2023-24

Qualitative review of debt, covenant, default, delinquency and waiver disclosures

Rating threshold: No default/delinquency = MS; covenant violation cured by waiver = MS with disclosure

Source inputs
Covenant / waiver disclosure
Normalized field: debt_note
Days-cash covenant violated; waiver obtained 9/12/2024
34960A.pdf · Note 7 — Long-Term Debt and Line of Credit · PDF page 14 (printed page 12) · Covenant compliance and waiver
Confidence: Medium · Analyst-confirmed read · Approved
View sourceOpen file
Calculation
  1. Note 7 discloses a facility loan and a line of credit.
  2. One covenant (days cash) was violated at year end; a written waiver was obtained from the lender.
  3. No payment default or delinquency.
OEI rating test

No default/delinquency = MS; covenant violation cured by waiver = MS with disclosure

Insights rating:MS
Comparison
Nsites logoCovenant violation with waiver / MS
Salesforce / CAPNo
Published OEINo / MS
Variance
StatusREQUIRES HUMAN JUDGMENT
Discrepancy record
Likely causeHuman override

The published report records simply 'No' default. The Nsites review found a waived covenant violation, which the framework treats as disclosable but non-defaulting. Ratings agree; the qualitative descriptions differ.

Suggested reconciliation: Confirm with OEI whether waived covenant violations should be disclosed in the CQ2 narrative.

Sequencing proof
  1. 1. Source documents ingested and classified.
  2. 2. Raw values extracted with page/cell coordinates.
  3. 3. OEI mapping and accounting treatment applied.
  4. 4. Formula executed — targets not in engine memory.
  5. 5. Nsites result locked 18:16:12 UTC.
  6. 6. Salesforce/CAP and published CQ2 revealed 18:16:43 UTC.
View full audit log →