Three-Year Aggregate Net Income
Sum of change in net assets over the three most recent audited years.
Formula: Σ change in net assets (3 years)
Meets Standard: Positive aggregate MS · negative aggregate DNMS
result
Σ change in net assets, FY2022-23 + FY2023-24 + FY2024-25
Rating threshold: Aggregate three-year net income positive = Meets Standard
- FY2022-23: NOT AVAILABLE — FY2022-23 audited statements were not provided in the data room
- FY2023-24: ($844,395) (audited, 26520A.pdf comparative column)
- FY2024-25: $337,028 (audited, 26520A.pdf)
- Two-of-three verified subtotal = ($507,367)
- Aggregate cannot be finalized until the FY2022-23 audit is supplied
Aggregate three-year net income positive = Meets Standard
($507,367) Partially validated across 2 of 3 years / Unable to ValidateCAP note: CAP pull contains single-year net income; no three-year aggregate is computed in Salesforce.
($507,367) verified across two years vs ($484,746) published across three
Difference: $22,621 — entirely the unavailable FY2022-23 year · Likely cause: Missing source document
Nsites calculation — verified years only
- FY2022-23 change in net assets
- Not available
- FY2023-24 change in net assets (26520A.pdf p. 8, comparative)
- ($844,395)
- FY2024-25 change in net assets (26520A.pdf p. 8)
- $337,028
- Two-of-three subtotal
- ($507,367)
FY2022-23 audited statements were not provided
OEI published — implied three-year total
- Published three-year aggregate
- ($484,746)
- Less the two independently verified years
- ($507,367)
- Implied FY2022-23 change in net assets
- $22,621
Derived by subtraction; no source document supports it
| Reconciling item | Effect | Why the two calculations differ |
|---|---|---|
| Missing FY2022-23 audited statements | $22,621 | The whole difference is the missing year. The two overlapping years agree with the audit to the dollar, so nothing suggests a methodology difference — only an evidence gap. |
Conclusion: The item stays Unable to Validate. Supplying the FY2022-23 audit would either confirm the implied $22,621 and close the item as an exact match, or expose a genuine methodology difference. The implied figure is never used as a calculation input.
- 1. Source documents ingested and classified.
- 2. Raw values extracted with page/cell coordinates.
- 3. OEI mapping and accounting treatment applied.
- 4. Formula executed — targets not in engine memory.
- 5. Nsites result locked 18:15:15 UTC.
- 6. Salesforce/CAP and published CQ2 revealed 18:15:44 UTC.